Study protocol for a randomized trial of bridge: Person-centered collaborative care for serious mental illness and cancer.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) experience inequities in cancer care that contribute to increased cancer mortality. Involving mental health at the time of cancer diagnosis may improve cancer care delivery for patients with SMI yet access to care remains challenging. Collaborative care is a promising approach to integrate mental health and cancer care that has not yet been studied in this marginalized population. METHODS/DESIGN: We describe a 24-week, two-arm, single-site randomized trial of person-centered collaborative care (Bridge) for patients with SMI (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression with psychiatric hospitalization) and their caregivers. 120 patients are randomized 1:1 to Bridge or Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) along with their caregivers. Researchers proactively identify individuals with SMI and a new breast, lung, gastrointestinal, or head and neck cancer that can be treated with curative intent. EUC includes informing oncologists about the patient's psychiatric diagnosis, notifying patients about available psychosocial services, and tracking patient and caregiver outcomes. Bridge includes a proactive assessment by psychiatry and social work, a person-centered, team approach including collaboration between mental health and oncology, and increased access to evidence-based psycho-oncology care. The primary outcome is cancer care disruptions evaluated by a blinded panel of oncologists. Secondary outcomes include patient and caregiver-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization. Barriers to Bridge implementation and dissemination are assessed using mixed methods. DISCUSSION: This trial will inform efforts to systematically identify individuals with SMI and cancer and generate the first experimental evidence for the impact of person-centered collaborative care on cancer care for this underserved population.

Bridge: Person-Centered Collaborative Care for Patients with Serious Mental Illness and Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) experience increased cancer mortality due to inequities in cancer treatment. Psychiatric care at cancer diagnosis may improve care delivery, yet models for integrating psychiatry and cancer care are lacking. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a person-centered collaborative care trial for SMI and cancer. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: We developed the Bridge intervention for patients with SMI (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe major depression) and cancer. Bridge includes proactive identification of SMI, person-centered care from a psychiatrist and case manager, and collaboration with oncology. We conducted a 12-week, single-group trial in patients with SMI and a new breast, gastrointestinal, lung, or head/neck cancer. We assessed the feasibility of patient identification, enrollment and study completion; evaluated acceptability and perceived benefit with exit interviews with patients, caregivers, and oncology clinicians; and examined change in psychiatric symptoms with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). RESULTS: From November 2015 to April 2016, 30/33 eligible patients (90.9%) enrolled, and 25/29 (86.2%) completed assessments at all timepoints, meeting feasibility criteria. Of 24 patients, 23 (95.8%) found meeting with the psychiatrist helpful; 16/19 caregivers (84.2%) shared that Bridge addressed key caregiving challenges. Oncology clinicians evaluated Bridge as "very" or "most" useful for 94.3% of patients. Exit interviews with all participant groups suggested that Bridge fostered patient-clinician trust, increased access to psychiatric treatment, and enabled patients to initiate and complete cancer treatment. Psychiatric symptoms on the BPRS improved from baseline to 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Bridge is a feasible and acceptable care delivery model for patients with SMI, their caregivers, and oncology clinicians. Randomized trials are warranted to assess the efficacy of improving cancer outcomes in this underserved population. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Serious mental illness affects 13 million U.S. adults who experience increased cancer mortality. To improve outcomes, new models of integrated oncology and mental health care are urgently needed. This study found that it was feasible to identify, enroll, and retain patients with serious mental illness and a new cancer in a trial of integrated mental health and cancer care (Bridge). Patients, caregivers, and oncologists reported that Bridge facilitated the initiation and completion of cancer care. Randomized trials are warranted to investigate the impact on cancer outcomes. Trial procedures may inform consent, engagement, and trial retention for patients with mental illness.

Predictors of Disruptions in Breast Cancer Care for Individuals with Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia experience markedly increased breast cancer mortality, yet reasons for this disparity are poorly understood. We sought to characterize disruptions in breast cancer care for patients with schizophrenia and identify modifiable predictors of those disruptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a medical record review of 95 patients with schizophrenia and breast cancer treated at an academic cancer center between 1993 and 2015. We defined cancer care disruptions as processes that interfere with guideline-concordant cancer care, including delays to diagnosis or treatment, deviations from stage-appropriate treatment, and interruptions in treatment. We hypothesized that lack of psychiatric treatment at cancer diagnosis would be associated with care disruptions. RESULTS: Half of patients with schizophrenia experienced at least one breast cancer care disruption. Deviations in stage-appropriate treatment were associated with breast cancer recurrence at 5 years (p = .045). Patients without a documented psychiatrist experienced more delays (p = .016), without documented antipsychotic medication experienced more deviations (p = .007), and with psychiatric hospitalizations after cancer diagnosis experienced more interruptions (p < .0001). Independent of stage, age, and documented primary care physician, lack of documented antipsychotic medication (odds ratio [OR] = 4.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.90, 12.98) and psychiatric care (OR = 4.56, 95% CI = 1.37, 15.15) predicted cancer care disruptions. CONCLUSION: Disruptions in breast cancer care are common for patients with schizophrenia and are associated with adverse outcomes, including cancer recurrence. Access to psychiatric treatment at cancer diagnosis may protect against critical disruptions in cancer care for this underserved population. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Disruptions in breast cancer care are common for patients with schizophrenia, yet access to mental health treatment is rarely integrated into cancer care. When oncologists documented a treating psychiatrist and antipsychotic medication, patients had fewer disruptions in breast cancer care after adjusting for age, cancer stage, and access to primary care. Addressing psychiatric comorbidity at breast cancer diagnosis may increase the likelihood that patients with schizophrenia receive timely, stage-appropriate cancer treatment. Comanagement of schizophrenia and breast cancer at cancer diagnosis may be one key strategy to decrease inequities in cancer treatment and improve cancer survival in this underserved population.